[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090604130107.GA1065@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:01:07 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, ying.huang@...el.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [2/2] KVM: Add VT-x machine check support
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 03:49:03PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >>This assumption is incorrect. This code is executed after preemption
> >>has been enabled, and we may have even slept before reaching it.
> >>
> >
> >The only thing that counts here is the context before the machine
> >check event. If there was a vmexit we know it was in guest context.
> >
> >The only requirement we have is that we're running still on the same
> >CPU. I assume that's true, otherwise the vmcb accesses wouldn't work?
> >
>
> It's not true, we're in preemptible context and may have even slept.
>
> vmcs access work because we have a preempt notifier called when we are
> scheduled in, and will execute vmclear/vmptrld as necessary. Look at
> kvm_preempt_ops in virt/kvm_main.c.
I see. So we need to move that check earlier. Do you have a preference
where it should be?
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists