[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A2C7927.30709@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 10:36:23 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, dipankar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuhotplug: introduce try_get_online_cpus() take 2
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> Add CC to Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>>
>> (This patch is against mainline but not for inclusion, it will adapted
>> against -mm when request)
>>
>> Requst For Comments and Reviewing Hungeringly.
>>
>> - Lockless for get_online_cpus()'s fast path
>> - Introduce try_get_online_cpus()
>
> One question for Gautham Shenoy -- are non-atomic CPU-hotplug notifiers
> always invoked from the task that did the cpu_hotplug_begin()?
>
> If so, well and good. If not, then it would not be possible to
> expedite RCU grace periods from within CPU-hotplug notifiers.
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
I have no proper machine for several days to test the next version
of this patch, so it is still being delayed a while.
Lai.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists