linux-kernel - Re: [patch] x86: clear TS in irq_ts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090609142254.GC32703@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:22:54 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: clear TS in irq_ts_save() when in an atomic
	section


* Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com> wrote:

> -	if (!in_interrupt())
> +	if (!in_atomic() && !in_interrupt())
>  		return 0;

since in_interrupt() implies in_atomic() (upstream), why not just 
do:

	if (!in_atomic())
 		return 0;

?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/