[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090610095319.GC25527@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:53:19 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/24] GFS2: Fix locking issue mounting gfs2meta fs
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 09:31:04AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> static struct super_block *get_gfs2_sb(const char *dev_name)
> {
> - struct super_block *sb;
Any reason you don't merge get_gfs2_sb into gfs2_get_sb_meta? That's
how most other get_sb callbacks are structured, and would also get rid
of the rather confusing get_gfs2_sb name.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists