linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ftrace: document basic ftracer/ftracer graph needs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:31:28 -0400
From:	Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ftrace: document basic ftracer/ftracer graph needs

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 13:04, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> While implementing ftracer and ftracer graph support, I found the exact
>> arch implementation details to be a bit lacking (and my x86 foo ain't
>> great).  So after pounding out support for the Blackfin arch, document
>> the requirements.
>
> This does not belong in the Kconfig. That's the last place a developer
> will look for implementing something.

yes and no -- i was following the existing documenting practice of
ftrace where details were added to the Kconfig.  guess i should fix
that in the process.

there should be at least tips in each HAVE_XXX as to where to look for
implementation details.
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/