[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0906101331250.6847@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org, mingo@...e.hu,
mpm@...enic.com, npiggin@...e.de, yinghai@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Early boot SLAB for 2.6.31
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
>
> I already have patches for that but they are against the -tip tree so I think
> we ought to just merge this series to mainline and fix everything up in
> subsystem trees for 2.6.31 proper.
Hmm. Are there any reasons why the scheduler fixups can't go in this
series? Do they depend on other things in -tip?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists