linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Early boot SLAB for 2.6.31

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:30:09 +0300
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	cl@...ux-foundation.org, hannes@...xchg.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	mpm@...enic.com, npiggin@...e.de, yinghai@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Early boot SLAB for 2.6.31

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
>> I already have patches for that but they are against the -tip tree so I think
>> we ought to just merge this series to mainline and fix everything up in
>> subsystem trees for 2.6.31 proper.
> 
> Hmm. Are there any reasons why the scheduler fixups can't go in this 
> series? Do they depend on other things in -tip?

The patches are rebased to -tip, yeah. I can do a version against your 
tree if you want but that will mean merge conflicts for Ingo. Hmm?

			Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/