[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1244747158.27363.59.camel@violet>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:05:58 +0200
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Performance Counters for Linux
Hi Linus,
> > What I'm saying is that this doesn't sound like something that needs
> > user-space in lock-step with kernel.
>
> Give it a rest.
>
> If that's true, then in a year or two we can just split it up already.
>
> But I note (once more) how _nobody_ has actually been able to accept the
> fact that oprofile was an abject failure as it was split up. Instead, you
> all dance around totally irrelevant issues.
so your whole reasoning is based on the fact that oprofile was a
horrible failure. All the other projects/subsystems that manage this
perfectly successful without breaking API/ABI abruptly and emerging
slowly when things change don't count. Stop dancing around oprofile so
much. It makes you dizzy ;)
Regards
Marcel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists