[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A3155E3.3030603@davidnewall.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 04:37:15 +0930
From: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Performance Counters for Linux
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> timeliness
> (kernel features vs taking advantage of them) and co-development (there
> always seems to be a huge impedance mis-match between user-level
> developers and kernel developers).
You seem to be saying that putting the code in kernel tree will make
user-level developers more responsive. FWIW (very little) I would have
quietly guessed the opposite result.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists