linux-kernel - Re: HTC Dream aka. t-mobile g1 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090612084622.60198b0e@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:46:22 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Ryan Mallon <ryan@...ewatersys.com>
Cc:	Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, swetland@...gle.com,
	pavel@....cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, san@...roid.com,
	rlove@...gle.com
Subject: Re: HTC Dream aka. t-mobile g1 support

> Thats my point though: In the meantime, it falls on Russell by default
> to be the one to verify all the patches going through. I think the same

No it doesn't

> is true for new architectures, if nobody else has the interest/hardware
> besides those posting the patches, then who is meant to do the
> reviewing/acking?

If nobody else is interested then you can do the reviewing/acking because
clearly nobody else cares if you make a mistake. And if they do then
they'll be motivated to add resources to assist you ;)

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/