[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A322D08.2020807@mnementh.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:25:12 +0100
From: Ian Molton <ian@...menth.co.uk>
To: Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>
CC: Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>, Ryan Mallon <ryan@...ewatersys.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, pavel@....cz,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, san@...roid.com,
rlove@...gle.com
Subject: Re: HTC Dream aka. t-mobile g1 support
Brian Swetland wrote:
>
> - would having some ifdefs around code using wakelock support be
> acceptable for the time being? The wakelock/suspendblock review does
> seem to be making progress on linux-pm if not super quickly, and I'd
> rather maintain some ifdefs than maintain two different versions of
> drivers while it's getting sorted out.
Personally, I'd say no.
Use git - create a version with them dropped and then you can create a
wakelock-dev branch on top of that with your new stuff in, which can be
rebased should the underlying branch move on (or get merged with mainline).
Its a problem that wouldnt exist if the original drivers had been
submitted long ago...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists