[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1244796426.7172.90.camel@pasglop>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:47:06 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: slab: setup allocators earlier in the boot sequence
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 11:17 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 17:39 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > For example, slab_is_available() didn't always exist, and so in the
> > early days on powerpc, we used a mem_init_done global that is set form
> > mem_init() (not perfect but works in practice). And we still have code
> > using that to do the test.
>
> Looking at powerpc arch code, can we get rid of the *_maybe_bootmem()
> functions now? Or is slab initialization too late still? FWIW, I think
> one simple fix on PPC is to just clear __GFP_NOWAIT in those functions
> (all of them seem to be using GFP_KERNEL which is wrong during boot).
I -think- we still use those in setup_arch() so we can't get rid of that
completely yet.
Cheers,
Ben.
> Pekka
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists