[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020906120149k6cbe5177vef1944d9d216e8b2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:49:31 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: slab: setup allocators earlier in the boot sequence
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Benjamin
Herrenschmidt<benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 11:04 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> Hi Nick,
>>
>> On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 10:02 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
>> > Fair enough, but this can be done right down in the synchronous
>> > reclaim path in the page allocator. This will catch more cases
>> > of code using the page allocator directly, and should be not
>> > as hot as the slab allocator.
>>
>> So you want to push the local_irq_enable() to the page allocator too? We
>> can certainly do that but I think we ought to wait for Andrew to merge
>> Mel's patches to mainline first, OK?
>
> Doesn't my patch take care of all the cases in a much more simple way ?
Nick, the patch Ben is talking about is here:
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/29700/
The biggest problem with the patch is that the gfp_smellybits is wide
open for abuse. Hmm.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists