[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A327161.7000803@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:16:49 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
cl@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] slab,slub: ignore __GFP_WAIT if we're booting or suspending
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
>> Hmm. This is turning into one epic patch discussion for sure! But here's a
>> patch to do what you suggested. With the amount of patches I am
>> generating, I'm bound to hit the right one sooner or later, no?-)
>
> Ok, this one looks pretty good. I like the statics, and I like how it lets
> each allocator decide what to do.
>
> Small nit: your mm/slab.c patch does an obviously unnecessary mask in:
>
> cache_alloc_debugcheck_before(cachep, flags & slab_gfp_flags);
>
> but that's stupid, because the bits were already masked earlier.
Yeah, the SLAB parts were completely untested. I have this in my tree
now (that I sent a pull request for):
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/penberg/slab-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=f6b726dae91cc74fb3a00f192932ec4fe0949875
Do you want me to drop it? I can also do an incremental patch to do the
unmasking as in this patch.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists