[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1244842956.23936.0.camel@pasglop>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 07:42:36 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, npiggin@...e.de,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] slab,slub: ignore __GFP_WAIT if we're booting or
suspending
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 08:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:34:00 +0300 Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
>
> > +static gfp_t slab_gfp_mask __read_mostly = __GFP_BITS_MASK & ~__GFP_WAIT;
>
> It'd be safer and saner to disable __GFP_FS and __GFP_IO as well.
Right. That's what my original patch does in fact. I also re-enabled
them all together but in that case, it might be better to re-enable FS
and IO later, I'll let experts decide.
> Having either of those flags set without __GFP_WAIT is a somewhat
> self-contradictory thing and there might be code under reclaim which
> assumes that __GFP_FS|__GFP_IO implies __GFP_WAIT.
>
> <wonders why mempool_alloc() didn't clear __GFP_FS>
Cheers,
Ben.
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists