[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090619145913.GA1389@ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:59:13 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
npiggin@...e.de, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] slab,slub: ignore __GFP_WAIT if we're booting or
suspending
Hi!
>
> As explained by Benjamin Herrenschmidt:
>
> Oh and btw, your patch alone doesn't fix powerpc, because it's missing
> a whole bunch of GFP_KERNEL's in the arch code... You would have to
> grep the entire kernel for things that check slab_is_available() and
> even then you'll be missing some.
>
> For example, slab_is_available() didn't always exist, and so in the
> early days on powerpc, we used a mem_init_done global that is set form
> mem_init() (not perfect but works in practice). And we still have code
> using that to do the test.
>
> Therefore, ignore __GFP_WAIT in the slab allocators if we're booting or
> suspending.
Ok... GFP_KERNEL allocations normally don't fail; now they
will. Should we at least force access to atomic reserves in such case?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists