[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A34FDBB.9090100@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:40:11 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davidel@...ilserver.org,
mtosatti@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [KVM PATCH v10] kvm: add support for irqfd
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> I don't want to assume that the eventfds all come from the same source.
>>
>> That said, we have a workaround, allocate a new gsi with the same routes
>> and attach the excess eventfds there.
>>
>
> Right. So you are ok with 1:1 irqfd:gsi requirement for now?
> This seems nicer than N:1 with an arbitrary N
Not too happy, but okay.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists