[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090614135008.GA12511@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:50:08 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davidel@...ilserver.org,
mtosatti@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [KVM PATCH v10] kvm: add support for irqfd
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 04:40:11PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
>
>
>>> I don't want to assume that the eventfds all come from the same source.
>>>
>>> That said, we have a workaround, allocate a new gsi with the same
>>> routes and attach the excess eventfds there.
>>>
>>
>> Right. So you are ok with 1:1 irqfd:gsi requirement for now?
>> This seems nicer than N:1 with an arbitrary N
>
> Not too happy, but okay.
Is the answer 42:1 then, as usual?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists