linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: cifs tree build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090615064618.120a2337@tlielax.poochiereds.net>
Date:	Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:46:18 -0400
From:	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
	<linux-cifs-client@...ts.samba.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: cifs tree build failure

On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:32:22 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Steve,
> 
> Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: In function 'cifs_show_options':
> fs/cifs/cifsfs.c:357: error: implicit declaration of function 'cifs_show_address'
> 
> Caused by commit 8616e0fc1e27295316f9821a883f0e9fa6f8200f ("cifs: remove
> unneeded NULL checks from cifs_show_options").
> 
> I have used the cifs tree from next-20090612 for today.

My fault. That function gets introduced in a later patch and I had a
bogus call left in here from when I reorganized the series. This
patch should fix it and a typo that got silently fixed in a patch that
hasn't been committed yet.

This patch should fix both. Steve F., let me know if you want me to
respin the series on top of this patch. Note that there's still a
harmless compiler warning that gets fixed in a later patch in the
series.

Thanks,
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>

View attachment "0001-cifs-fix-problems-with-earlier-patches.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1424 bytes)