[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <524f69650906150647y15f4b6e2w3ce2df97064fb95b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:47:12 -0500
From: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-cifs-client@...ts.samba.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: cifs tree build failure
Jeff,
I just applied and reviewed your patch 5 (thus modified your patch
slightly before merging).
https://mail.google.com/mail/?shva=1#search/cifs_show_address/121cfb7757cb8e86
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Jeff Layton<jlayton@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:32:22 +1000
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: In function 'cifs_show_options':
>> fs/cifs/cifsfs.c:357: error: implicit declaration of function 'cifs_show_address'
>>
>> Caused by commit 8616e0fc1e27295316f9821a883f0e9fa6f8200f ("cifs: remove
>> unneeded NULL checks from cifs_show_options").
>>
>> I have used the cifs tree from next-20090612 for today.
>
> My fault. That function gets introduced in a later patch and I had a
> bogus call left in here from when I reorganized the series. This
> patch should fix it and a typo that got silently fixed in a patch that
> hasn't been committed yet.
>
> This patch should fix both. Steve F., let me know if you want me to
> respin the series on top of this patch. Note that there's still a
> harmless compiler warning that gets fixed in a later patch in the
> series.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
>
--
Thanks,
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists