[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A3922A4.1080300@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:06:44 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 6/7] x86: Move kernel_fpu_using to asm/i387.h
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> +static inline int kernel_fpu_using(void)
>> +{
>> + if (in_interrupt() && !(read_cr0() & X86_CR0_TS))
>> + return 1;
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>
> Looks sane to me. Herbert, do you ack it?
>
Although I have to say, the structure of:
if (boolean test)
return 1;
return 0;
... truly was hit with the ugly stick. It really should be:
static inline bool kernel_fpu_using(void)
{
return in_interrupt() && !(read_cr0() && C86_CR0_TS);
}
Huang: if I recall correctly, these functions were originally designed
to deal with the fact that VIA processors generate spurious #TS faults
due to broken design of the Padlock instructions. The AES and PCLMUL
instructions actually use SSE registers and so will require different
structure.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists