[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090618014858.GA1368@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:48:58 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 6/7] x86: Move kernel_fpu_using to asm/i387.h
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:06:44AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >>
> >> +static inline int kernel_fpu_using(void)
> >> +{
> >> + if (in_interrupt() && !(read_cr0() & X86_CR0_TS))
> >> + return 1;
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >
> > Looks sane to me. Herbert, do you ack it?
Ack. Please pick it up in your tree. Thanks!
> Huang: if I recall correctly, these functions were originally designed
> to deal with the fact that VIA processors generate spurious #TS faults
> due to broken design of the Padlock instructions. The AES and PCLMUL
> instructions actually use SSE registers and so will require different
> structure.
No irq_ts_save was the one designed for the VIA, the Intel stuff
does save the FPU state.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists