[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A3A02F8.6040301@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:03:52 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davidel@...ilserver.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [KVM-RFC PATCH 1/2] eventfd: add an explicit srcu based notifier
interface
On 06/16/2009 05:40 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>
> Something else to consider: For iosignalfd, we can assume we will
> always be called from vcpu process context so we might not really need
> official affirmation from the system. For irqfd, we cannot predict who
> may be injecting the interrupt (for instance, it might be a
> PCI-passthrough hard-irq context). I am not sure if this knowledge
> actually helps to simplify the problem space, but I thought I should
> mention it.
>
We can't assume anything. Userspace might hand out that eventfd to anyone.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists