[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090618062301.GA11155@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:23:01 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
avi@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [KVM-RFC PATCH 1/2] eventfd: add an explicit srcu based
notifier interface
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 04:21:19PM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> The interface is just ugly IMO. You have eventfd_signal() that can sleep,
> or not, depending on the registered ->signal() function implementations.
> This is pretty bad, a lot worse than the theoretical us spent in the
> schedule_work() processing.
I agree. How about the idea of introducing eventfd_signal_from_task
which can sleep? Does this sound same?
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists