[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090618.191448.886429908004553840.mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:14:48 +0900 (JST)
From: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>
To: mingo@...e.hu
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Hide runqueues from direct refer at
source code level
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Hide runqueues from direct refer at source code level
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:31:11 +0200
> ition: inline
> Subject: Re: [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Hide runqueues from direct refer at source code level
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> To: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
> mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp, tglx@...utronix.de
> Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:31:11 +0200
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
> Received-SPF: neutral (mx2.mail.elte.hu: 157.181.1.14 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of elte.hu) client-ip=157.181.1.14; envelope-from=mingo@...e.hu; helo=elvis.elte.hu;
> X-Mew: tab/spc characters on Subject: are simplified.
>
>
> * tip-bot for Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp> wrote:
>
> > --- a/kernel/sched.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> > @@ -6630,7 +6630,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(yield);
> > */
> > void __sched io_schedule(void)
> > {
> > - struct rq *rq = &__raw_get_cpu_var(runqueues);
> > + struct rq *rq = this_rq();
> >
> > delayacct_blkio_start();
> > atomic_inc(&rq->nr_iowait);
> > @@ -6642,7 +6642,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(io_schedule);
> >
> > long __sched io_schedule_timeout(long timeout)
> > {
> > - struct rq *rq = &__raw_get_cpu_var(runqueues);
> > + struct rq *rq = this_rq();
> > long ret;
>
> I removed these two changes. Did you notice the __raw prefix?
>
> Ingo
>
Thanks for your fix, I didn't notice...
I wrote a patch to fix these two points.
After applying this patch,
all direct reference to runqueues is in macros. How is this?
Signed-off-by: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 8ec9d13..e2ca8c1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -692,6 +692,7 @@ static inline int cpu_of(struct rq *rq)
#define this_rq() (&__get_cpu_var(runqueues))
#define task_rq(p) cpu_rq(task_cpu(p))
#define cpu_curr(cpu) (cpu_rq(cpu)->curr)
+#define raw_rq() (&__raw_get_cpu_var(runqueues))
inline void update_rq_clock(struct rq *rq)
{
@@ -6625,7 +6626,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(yield);
*/
void __sched io_schedule(void)
{
- struct rq *rq = &__raw_get_cpu_var(runqueues);
+ struct rq *rq = raw_rq();
delayacct_blkio_start();
atomic_inc(&rq->nr_iowait);
@@ -6637,7 +6638,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(io_schedule);
long __sched io_schedule_timeout(long timeout)
{
- struct rq *rq = &__raw_get_cpu_var(runqueues);
+ struct rq *rq = raw_rq();
long ret;
delayacct_blkio_start();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists