linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/16] x86, mce: squash mce_intel.c into therm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A3A4856.3080306@zytor.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:59:50 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>
CC:	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/16] x86, mce: squash mce_intel.c into therm_throt.c

huang ying wrote:
>>
>> You can pull out "codes may not be shared" from therm_throt.c and
>> put it again into mce_intel.c (that was mce_intel_64.c).  But I
>> believe it is not needed now, until another code is available.
>> Or you can rename therm_throt.c to thermal_intel.c or so for a while.
> 
> I think thermal_intel.c is better.
> 

Actually intel_thermal.c and intel_cmci.c would probably be the right
naming.  The mce_ prefix for files in this directory is redundant; so
for vendor-specific features the vendor is the higher order organizing
factor.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/