linux-kernel - Re: [KVM PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: Fix races in irqfd using new eventfd_kref

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:32:22 +0300
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
Cc:	Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>,
	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	avi@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [KVM PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: Fix races in irqfd using new
	eventfd_kref_get interface

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:11:12AM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> 
> > Not really, it's impossible to document all races one have thought
> > about and avoided.
> 
> Well, when some new code has non-trivial locking/racing logics, you better 
> document it as clearly as possible, akpm announced time ago.

Absolutely. But IMO documentation in the form of "fields A B C are
protected by lock X" in a single place near field declaration is better
than "we take lock X here to protect against race with user thread using
fields A B C" sprinkled all over the code.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/