[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0906221140570.10952@makko.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
cc: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
avi@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [KVM PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: Fix races in irqfd using new eventfd_kref_get
interface
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:11:12AM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > > Not really, it's impossible to document all races one have thought
> > > about and avoided.
> >
> > Well, when some new code has non-trivial locking/racing logics, you better
> > document it as clearly as possible, akpm announced time ago.
>
> Absolutely. But IMO documentation in the form of "fields A B C are
> protected by lock X" in a single place near field declaration is better
> than "we take lock X here to protect against race with user thread using
> fields A B C" sprinkled all over the code.
Exactly what akpm suggested. A fat comment on top of the C file describing
locking logic and pitfalls.
- Davide
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists