[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A3FFF17.9020701@am.sony.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:00:55 -0700
From: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC: Chris Simmonds <chris@...t.co.uk>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Marco <marco.stornelli@...il.com>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Embedded <linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] Pramfs: Include files
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> It is not that we are talking big and complex stuff here.
I agree completely.
> pramfs is likely to be used for small things and then having to
> fix endian on a few headers in the on-dsk format does not matter.
I agree with this, but mostly out of exhaustion.
> Not compared to the potential disadvantages.
I can see no potential disadvantages.
> It should be possible to read a file-system on your x86 64bit
> box that you wrote with your small powerpc target.
For a (NV)RAM-based filesystem?? WTH???
This is not my file system, so I don't have a dog in this
fight. I just wanted to clarify what I thought were some
misconceptions about the use cases and priorities for the
FS. My "advocacy" may be interfering with understanding
this system and its purpose. I'll be quiet now.
-- Tim
=============================
Tim Bird
Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America
=============================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists