[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090622085735.GB6499@cr0.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:57:35 +0800
From: Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
jdike@...toit.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:43:52AM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>
>Stephan hi.
>
>The above breakage is the usual stuff we get every merge window. With people doing
>cross arch work and neglecting UML.
>
>Who is the person or people responsible for the large linux-next compilation rig?
>Is it possible to also add a UML traget, at least for the x86_64/x86_32 sub-arch?
Agreed.
Stephan, could you please also do compiling tests for UML in your -next tree?
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists