linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH update 2] SCSI: explain the hidden scsi_wait

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090622095701.72c22150@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:57:01 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH update 2] SCSI: explain the hidden scsi_wait_scan
 Kconfig variable

On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:03:23 +0200 (CEST)
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> wrote:

> People keep sending patches to expose CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_SCAN as a tunable
> item.  These patches aren't accepted upstream, so let's stop the ongoing
> irritation of people due to the unconditionally installed module and its
> Kconfig symbol.

How about the other possibility. People keepmaking it tunable because it
makes sense for it to be tunable. Far better IMHO to make it tunable "if
EMBEDDED"

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/