[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A408D32.9010500@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:07:14 +0900
From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
To: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
CC: linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Haren Myneni <hbabu@...ibm.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ia64, kdump: Mask MCA/INIT on freezing cpus
Robin Holt wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 09:33:46AM +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
>> Robin Holt wrote:
> ...
>> Do you mean that the 2nd kernel should be able to handle MCA/INIT from its
>> boot up? I guess the word PROM is nearly equal to PAL/SAL firmware, if so
>> then I don't think there are good generic interface/procedure could be
>> useful here. Do you have any concrete idea?
>
> No concrete ideas. Just a really uneasy feeling whenever the INIT
> is disabled.
Don't worry, don't be afraid.
Again, my patches don't disable INIT until kdump is invoked.
(And if kdump is invoked via INIT, it have already masked at the begging
of INIT handlers.)
> If you could give this some consideration, I would appreciate it.
> I really don't have the time to dedicate to thinking all the way through
> and therefore will not stand in the way of any patch you propose.
> If I can be of help in any way, please let me know.
I know you guys are busy with this and that...
It would be the best if you could test my patches soon on SGI servers,
but I would appreciate it too if you could let me know if you have any
trouble on the patches later.
Thanks,
H.Seto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists