[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090623080908.GA11181@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:09:08 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"sfi-devel@...plefirmware.org" <sfi-devel@...plefirmware.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] SFI: include/linux/sfi.h
* Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:00:47 +0800
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> >
> > * Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > > For these arch_early_ioremap/arch_early_iounmap API, do you mean
> > > we should put it in a sfi.h under "asm" folder? The reason we put
> > > it here is to give a arch independent API declaration here and let
> > > each arch implement its own func.
> >
> > Yeah, i'd suggest to create a new early-remap.h and
> > early-remap.c kind of file to collect the existing bits for
> > that. It's a bit ugly (not really the fault of SFI - these are
> > pre-existing facilities) and might need some love - we better
> > move it apart so that the light of attention shines on it.
> >
> > What's the target merge of the SFI stuff, 2.6.31?
>
> AFAIK, Len's target is for 2.6.32
Ah, ok - then there's time. The code is almost good for .31 btw ;-)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists