[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090623194916.GA18657@localhost>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:49:16 +0200
From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] ntp updates for 2.6.31
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 09:18:38PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > > > I'm not very familiar with the PPS API, is there something
> > > > wrong with it?
> > >
> > > The PPS patches i've seen just export IRQ timestamps to
> > > user-space.
> > >
> > > That is not very robust in my opinion when it comes to do time
> > > approximations - to get quick, low-latency action and precise
> > > measurements it's best to keep the critical path as short as
> > > possible, and within a single source code repository: i.e.
> > > within the kernel.
> >
> > That's what kernel PPS discipline does, it will be probably
> > included later. Its performance is an order or two better than the
> > PLL/FLL discipline.
>
> Is there some kernel patch i can look at?
It's in the old PPSkit patches for 2.4 kernels, function hardpps().
--
Miroslav Lichvar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists