linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 16/20] omapfb: dispc: Allow multiple external IRQ handlers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090624121608.GA17604@nokia.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:16:08 +0300
From:	Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>
To:	"Deak Imre (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" <imre.deak@...ia.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@...zta.fm>,
	Antonino Daplas <adaplas@...il.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	"Valkeinen Tomi (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" <Tomi.Valkeinen@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/20] omapfb: dispc: Allow multiple external IRQ
 handlers

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 01:33:41PM +0200, Deak Imre (Nokia-D/Helsinki) wrote:
> From: Daniel Stone <daniel.stone@...ia.com>
> 
> Previously, the only external (to dispc.c) IRQ handler was RFBI's
> frame done handler.  dispc's IRQ framework was very dumb: you could only
> have one handler, and the semantics of {request,free}_irq were odd, to
> say the least.
> 
> The new framework allows multiple consumers to register arbitrary IRQ
> masks.

No chance to use genirq ?

Then rfbi and others could simply request_irq() as usual

-- 
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/