[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090625152736.GC6761@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:27:36 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net,
dada1@...mosbay.com, zbr@...emap.net, jeff.chua.linux@...il.com,
paulus@...ba.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, jengelh@...ozas.de,
r000n@...0n.net, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 0/3] expedited "big hammer" RCU grace periods
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:59:53AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 08:03:03PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > include/linux/rcuclassic.h | 15 ++-
> > >
> > > heh, we dont have this file anymore ... as of today, right? :)
> >
> > Ah, I was assuming that expedited RCU would happen before removal
> > of Classic RCU.
>
> Our general preference is to zap code.
Actually worked out nicely in this case -- the fact that Classic RCU
is no longer in -tip meant that I could dump 25% of my test cases for
expedited RCU. ;-)
I will be posting the updated patch shortly.
> /me stares at:
>
> $ git diff --stat -M v2.6.30..v2.6.31-rc1 | tail -1
> 7743 files changed, 782278 insertions(+), 403162 deletions(-)
>
> /me corrects himself:
>
> Okay, so the zapping of code is the divine guiding principle we've
> been following for 15 years. Ending up with a kernel that is 11
> million lines of code is a small imperfection of mankind and is to
> be fixed.
;-) ;-) ;-)
I guess that if 11 million lines of code is a small imperfection of
mankind, we can only be thankful that we are not tasked with dealing
with the large imperfections. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists