[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0906250944511.3605@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
davem@...emloft.net, dada1@...mosbay.com, zbr@...emap.net,
jeff.chua.linux@...il.com, paulus@...ba.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
jengelh@...ozas.de, r000n@...0n.net, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 0/3] expedited "big hammer" RCU grace periods
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Our general preference is to zap code.
>
> /me stares at:
>
> $ git diff --stat -M v2.6.30..v2.6.31-rc1 | tail -1
> 7743 files changed, 782278 insertions(+), 403162 deletions(-)
>
> /me corrects himself:
Yes. Our general preference is to zap code, if only because it's so damn
unusual.
When one out of a hundred patches actually has more removals than
additions, we make a big deal out of it ("Look - I actually simplified
things"). For the 99 other patches we never size in polite company.
Oh well. But every time we add lines, we do it with the _best_ intentions.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists