[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1246001792.31755.176.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:36:32 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: register_timer_hook use in arch/sh/oprofile
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 09:23 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 15:24 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > [ And long-term analysis ('perf stat' type of runs) dont need IRQs
> > > anyway - perfcounters reads outs the counts and summarizes them
> > > across the measured workload. ]
> >
> > If the counter width is less than 64 bits we do need to have some
> > interrupt to read them from before they cycle so we can accumulate
> > the deltas into a proper u64.
>
> Yeah - but even that can be driven from some housekeeping hrtimer.
Oh absolutely, but its one of those things one should not forget to do.
> > But for proper 64 bit hardware counters there is indeed no need
> > for that.
>
> Indeed - although they are rare.
Paul Mundt mentioned he had some.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists