linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] fix RCU-callback-after-kmem_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090626090355.GA11450@wotan.suse.de>
Date:	Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:03:55 +0200
From:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Cc:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
	penberg@...helsinki.fi, jdb@...x.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] fix RCU-callback-after-kmem_cache_destroy problem in sl[aou]b

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 04:27:19PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 12:31 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Hello!
> > 
> > Jesper noted that kmem_cache_destroy() invokes synchronize_rcu() rather
> > than rcu_barrier() in the SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU case, which could result
> > in RCU callbacks accessing a kmem_cache after it had been destroyed.
> > 
> > The following untested (might not even compile) patch proposes a fix.
> 
> Acked-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
> 
> Nick, you'll want to make sure you get this in SLQB.

Thanks Matt. Paul, I think this should be appropriate for
stable@...nel.org too?

> 
> > Reported-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jdb@...x.dk>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  slab.c |    2 +-
> >  slob.c |    2 ++
> >  slub.c |    2 ++
> >  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
> > index e74a16e..5241b65 100644
> > --- a/mm/slab.c
> > +++ b/mm/slab.c
> > @@ -2547,7 +2547,7 @@ void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	if (unlikely(cachep->flags & SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU))
> > -		synchronize_rcu();
> > +		rcu_barrier();
> >  
> >  	__kmem_cache_destroy(cachep);
> >  	mutex_unlock(&cache_chain_mutex);
> > diff --git a/mm/slob.c b/mm/slob.c
> > index c78742d..9641da3 100644
> > --- a/mm/slob.c
> > +++ b/mm/slob.c
> > @@ -595,6 +595,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_create);
> >  void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *c)
> >  {
> >  	kmemleak_free(c);
> > +	if (c->flags & SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU)
> > +		rcu_barrier();
> >  	slob_free(c, sizeof(struct kmem_cache));
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_destroy);
> > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > index 819f056..a9201d8 100644
> > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > @@ -2595,6 +2595,8 @@ static inline int kmem_cache_close(struct kmem_cache *s)
> >   */
> >  void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *s)
> >  {
> > +	if (s->flags & SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU)
> > +		rcu_barrier();
> >  	down_write(&slub_lock);
> >  	s->refcount--;
> >  	if (!s->refcount) {
> 
> -- 
> http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/