linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 0/2] fix gpio-keys debouncing and timer sleep issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <EADF0A36011179459010BDF5142A457501C9EE51CC@pdsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:50:00 +0800
From:	"Du, Alek" <alek.du@...el.com>
To:	Jani Nikula <ext-jani.1.nikula@...ia.com>
CC:	"dmitry.torokhov@...il.com" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	"soni.trilok@...il.com" <soni.trilok@...il.com>,
	"ben-linux@...ff.org" <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	"ext-phil.2.carmody@...ia.com" <ext-phil.2.carmody@...ia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] fix gpio-keys debouncing and timer sleep issues

>From: Jani Nikula [mailto:ext-jani.1.nikula@...ia.com]
>Sent: 2009年6月26日 20:15
>To: Du, Alek
>Cc: dmitry.torokhov@...il.com; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
>linux-input@...r.kernel.org; soni.trilok@...il.com; ben-linux@...ff.org;
>ext-phil.2.carmody@...ia.com; ext-jani.1.nikula@...ia.com
>Subject: [PATCH 0/2] fix gpio-keys debouncing and timer sleep issues
>
>Alek, someone might depend on how debouncing worked before, so let's not
>break it. I, for one, am looking at using this in the future, and would
>want this to work as it was before.
>
>Why don't we fix this instead of debating? For simplicity, here's first
>a revert of the original patch and then a fix to the sleep issue.
>Unfortunately, I do not have the equipment to properly test this right
>now.

Agree, and thanks for the patch.

>Could you please review and test this if you have the equipment? Add
>your signed-off-by and comments, of course. Would that be okay?

Ok, will test it later. And of course, we need Dmitry ACK it finally.

Alek