linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix gpio-keys debouncing and timer sleep issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:59:40 -0700
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	Jani Nikula <ext-jani.1.nikula@...ia.com>
Cc:	alek.du@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, soni.trilok@...il.com,
	ben-linux@...ff.org, ext-phil.2.carmody@...ia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] fix gpio-keys debouncing and timer sleep issues

Hi Jani,

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 03:15:16PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Alek, someone might depend on how debouncing worked before, so let's not 
> break it. I, for one, am looking at using this in the future, and would 
> want this to work as it was before.
> 
> Why don't we fix this instead of debating? For simplicity, here's first 
> a revert of the original patch and then a fix to the sleep issue. 
> Unfortunately, I do not have the equipment to properly test this right 
> now.
> 

I intend to apply the both patches. It is unfortunate that we need to
use both a timer and a workqueue, I wonder what would it take to
implement something like reschedule_delayed_work() that would adjust
the delay in the same fashion that mod_timer() does?

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/