[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A451BA4.4090000@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:04:04 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: "Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] x86: introduce a set of platform feature flags
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Btw., this enumeration of basic PC features isnt bad in itself - and
> if there's a boot-flag based detection method (like on MRST) then
> this can convey a 'should this platform driver attempt to
> initialize' information to the driver, and rather cleanly so.
>
That is the whole point of this, yes. Furthermore, it is expected that
we *also* would be able to set platform flags based on early probes.
> But there's bad uses of this as well, and those bad uses seem to
> dominate this patch-set.
Not entirely surprising, since this stuff is more or less randomly
sprinkled through the existing code. We have a huge bunch of legacy
code and yes, it needs cleanup.
This is a huge opportunity, of course, but it's going to be a lot of
work. A lot of this is likely to overlap directly with the needs of
Xen, too.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists