linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 8/9] x86/apic: match destination id with destination mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <43F901BD926A4E43B106BF17856F0755641A4717@orsmsx508.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:41:57 -0700
From:	"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 8/9] x86/apic: match destination id with destination mode

>so this patch will put all ioapic routing to boot_cpu_id what is that?
>how can you assume that is is apic id.?
>that is NOT apic id.
[[JPAN]] I don't know a better way to assign physical APIC IDs. Any suggestions?
At least giving boot_cpu_id would prevent system to crash( when you have logical 
ID assigned as physical).

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/