[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090629031804.GA6764@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:18:04 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: kerneloops.org report for the week
* Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:
> Few "highlights" this week
> * mem_cgroup_add_lru_list (rank 2) is a high rising issue;
> it's list corruption, question is why this is new
> * rank 13 (memcmp in the raid code) is also new
> * the warning in get_free_pages that has been discussed on lkml is dropping
> from the ranks again
>
>
> This week, a total of 15273 oopses and warnings have been reported,
> compared to 13384 reports in the previous week.
>
>
> Rank 2: mem_cgroup_add_lru_list (warn)
> Reported 1554 times (1622 total reports)
> List corruption in the VM code
> This oops was last seen in version 2.6.30-git19, and first seen in 2.6.29.
> More info: http://www.kerneloops.org/searchweek.php?search=mem_cgroup_add_lru_list
At least one list corruption bug was fixed by:
cb4cbcf: mm: fix incorrect page removal from LRU
> Rank 3: getnstimeofday (warning)
> Reported 1319 times (4893 total reports)
> [suspend resume] getnstimeofday() is called before timekeeping is resumed
> This oops was last seen in version 2.6.30, and first seen in 2.6.24.
> More info: http://www.kerneloops.org/searchweek.php?search=getnstimeofday
Probably caused by some buggy driver callback?
> Rank 7: hres_timers_resume (warning)
> Reported 763 times (2368 total reports)
> [suspend resume] hres_timers_resume() is incorrectly called with interrupts on
> This warning was last seen in version 2.6.30, and first seen in 2.6.24.7.
> More info: http://www.kerneloops.org/searchweek.php?search=hres_timers_resume
This is probably a driver incorrectly enabling irqs in a resume
callback. This should be easier and more specific to debug with the
lockdep based annotation i suggested for the suspend code in various
`mails.
> Rank 8: generic_get_mtrr (warning)
> Reported 544 times (2061 total reports)
> BIOS bug where the MTRRs are not set up correctly
> This warning was last seen in version 2.6.30, and first seen in 2.6.25.3.
> More info: http://www.kerneloops.org/searchweek.php?search=generic_get_mtrr
I think this calls for enabling the x86 MTRR sanitizer by default -
500 out of 15000 reports suggests a significant proportion of Linux
systems is affected by MTRR setup problems.
I.e. we should change:
config MTRR_SANITIZER_ENABLE_DEFAULT
int "MTRR cleanup enable value (0-1)"
range 0 1
default "0"
To 'default "1"'. Any objections?
If the MTRR sanitizer is enabled then i think the above warning in
generic_get_mtrr() should never trigger.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists