[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090629105246.GB3731@localdomain.by>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:52:46 +0300
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...l.by>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: kmemleak hexdump proposal
On (06/29/09 11:38), Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 13:19 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 13:19 +0300, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > Well, it's not easy to come up with something strong.
> > > I agree, that stack gives you almost all you need.
> > >
> > > HEX dump can give you a _tip_ in case you're not sure.
> >
> > Don't get me wrong, I'm not against it in any way. If Catalin is
> > interested in merging this kind of functionality, go for it! You might
> > want to consider unconditionally enabling the hexdump. If the
> > information is valuable, we should print it all the time.
>
> Though I prefer to do as much as possible in user space,
Agreed. Good example is 'function filtering' ;)
> I think this feature would be useful.
>
So, I'll continue my work. (given patch didn't even passed ./checkpatch.pl).
Ok?
> Anyway, I may not include it before the next merging window (when is
> actually the best time for new features). Currently, my main focus is on
> reducing the false positives.
Sure. No problems.
>
> --
> Catalin
>
Sergey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists