[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090629110812.GC3731@localdomain.by>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:08:12 +0300
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...l.by>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: kmemleak hexdump proposal
On (06/29/09 11:58), Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 13:45 +0300, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > BTW, printing it all the time we can spam kmemleak (in case there are objects sized 2K, 4K and so on).
> > That's why I wrote about hexdump=OBJECT_POINTER.
>
> I'm more in favour of an on/off hexdump feature (maybe even permanently
> on) and with a limit to the number of bytes it displays. For larger
> blocks, the hexdump=OBJECT_POINTER is easily achievable in user space
> via /dev/kmem.
>
Yeah. Good point.
> My proposal is for an always on hexdump but with no more than 2-3 lines
> of hex values.
I like it.
> As Pekka said, I should get it into linux-next before the
> next merging window.
I'll send new patch to you (today evening)/(tomorrow).
Ok?
>
> --
> Catalin
>
Sergey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists