[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090630191517.GB20567@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:15:17 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>, tj@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, andi@...stfloor.org, hpa@...or.com,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] percpu: generalize first chunk allocators and
improve lpage NUMA support
* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:20:53 -0400 (EDT)
> Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > I assume from the tremendous number of
> > > for_each_possible_cpu()s that CPU hotplug awareness won't be
> > > happening.
> >
> > Per cpu areas are allocated for all possible processors. No need
> > to handle offlining and onlining them.
>
> Well yes. My point is that this is a bug-not-a-feature ;)
Yeah, it's a bug for something like a virtual environment which
boots generic kernels that might have 64 possible CPUs (on a true
64-way system), but which will have fewer in practice.
It's pretty basic stuff: the on-demand allocation of percpu
resources.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists