linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET] percpu: generalize first chunk allocators and improve lpage NUMA support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0906301023590.6124@gentwo.org>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:24:46 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	tj@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, andi@...stfloor.org,
	hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] percpu: generalize first chunk allocators and improve
 lpage NUMA support

On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:20:53 -0400 (EDT)
> Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > I assume from the tremendous number of for_each_possible_cpu()s that
> > > CPU hotplug awareness won't be happening.
> >
> > Per cpu areas are allocated for all possible processors. No need to handle
> > offlining and onlining them.
>
> Well yes.  My point is that this is a bug-not-a-feature ;)

Its a feature that I would like to exploit in the future to get rid of
some of the hotplug callbacks in the allocator.

Some state also needs to be kept for offlined processors. This is done in
per cpu data.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/