linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 3/6][ARM] new ARM SoC support: BCMRing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5d5443650906292230k27e70863l49566462328f0a43@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:00:41 +0530
From:	Trilok Soni <soni.trilok@...il.com>
To:	"Leo (Hao) Chen" <leochen@...adcom.com>
Cc:	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/6][ARM] new ARM SoC support: BCMRing

Hi Leo,

>>
>> On 16:29 Fri 26 Jun     , Leo (Hao) Chen wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > This is the third patch.  This big patch contains the core
>> arch code in arch/arm/mach-bcmring directory.
>> > Header files in arch/arm/mach-bcmring/include/mach are
>> included as well.
>> You need to check your patches with checkpatch.pl as your
>> patches do not respect
>> the linux conding style in a lot's of space
>>
> I'll fix the errors found by the checkpatch.pl script.  Is it okay to pass the checkpatch.pl with some warnings?
>

I don't think so, but if you find any false positives you can report to ML.


-- 
---Trilok Soni
http://triloksoni.wordpress.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/triloksoni
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/