[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A4B6184.7000903@parrot.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:15:48 +0200
From: Matthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet@...rot.com>
To: <sdhci-devel@...ts.ossman.eu>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<pierre@...man.eu>
Subject: sdhci can turn off irq up to 200 ms
Hi,
sdhci code got tasklets (sdhci_tasklet_card and sdhci_tasklet_finish),
that does :
{
spin_lock_irqsave
if (cond) {
sdhci_reset
sdhci_reset
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore
}
The problem is that sdhci_reset [1] does busy pooling on a register up
to a timeout of 100 ms.
That's not low latency friendly.
On our system, we saw that sdhci_reset take 1 ms. That should be because
we enter in mdelay, even if the hardware clears the bit faster.
I wonder why there is an mdelay(1). Using cpu_relax and
time_is_after_jiffies should make sdhci_reset faster.
Matthieu
[1]
static void sdhci_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask)
{
unsigned long timeout;
u32 uninitialized_var(ier);
[...]
sdhci_writeb(host, mask, SDHCI_SOFTWARE_RESET);
if (mask & SDHCI_RESET_ALL)
host->clock = 0;
/* Wait max 100 ms */
timeout = 100;
/* hw clears the bit when it's done */
while (sdhci_readb(host, SDHCI_SOFTWARE_RESET) & mask) {
if (timeout == 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Reset 0x%x never completed.\n",
mmc_hostname(host->mmc), (int)mask);
sdhci_dumpregs(host);
return;
}
timeout--;
mdelay(1);
}
[...]
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists